Fine-tune team strengths to model injuries, form, or what-if scenarios
Each run draws new ratings around the real ones. Higher variance means bigger swings.
Lipscomb
Austin Peay
|
78
C+
|
Overall |
84
B
|
|
76
C
|
Power |
79
C+
|
|
79
C+
6099
|
Offensive |
81
B-
6099
|
|
Lipscomb
6099
Austin Peay
6099
|
||
|
73
C-
6099
|
Defensive |
75
C
6099
|
|
Lipscomb
6099
Austin Peay
6099
|
||
|
70
C-
|
SoS (Current) |
66
D
|
|
70
C-
|
SoS (Future) |
66
D
|
Lipscomb
Austin Peay
| 193 | Overall | 138 |
| 220 | Power | 187 |
| 191 | Offensive | 171 |
| 245 | Defensive | 221 |
| 270 | SoS (Current) | 307 |
| 270 | SoS (Future) | 307 |
Wk 24 (Apr 7), 2025-26: Austin Peay 67%, Lipscomb 33% at Austin Peay.
Austin Peay's win probability against Lipscomb has held at 47% over the last 6 weeks — this matchup has settled.
Austin Peay's win probability against Lipscomb has held at 57% over the last 6 weeks — this matchup has settled.
Austin Peay's win probability against Lipscomb has held at 67% over the last 6 weeks — this matchup has settled.
| Week | At Lipscomb | Neutral | At Austin Peay |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | 14% | 20% | 28% |
| Wk 1 | 67% | 75% | 83% |
| Wk 2 | 79% | 85% | 90% |
| Wk 3 | 69% | 77% | 84% |
| Wk 4 | 57% | 66% | 75% |
| Wk 5 | 55% | 65% | 74% |
| Wk 6 | 47% | 57% | 67% |
| Wk 7 | 33% | 42% | 52% |
| Wk 8 | 30% | 39% | 49% |
| Wk 9 | 30% | 39% | 49% |
| Wk 10 | 36% | 46% | 56% |
| Wk 11 | 42% | 52% | 62% |
| Wk 12 | 39% | 49% | 59% |
| Wk 13 | 40% | 50% | 60% |
| Wk 14 | 42% | 52% | 62% |
| Wk 15 | 49% | 59% | 69% |
| Wk 16 | 51% | 60% | 70% |
| Wk 17 | 46% | 56% | 66% |
| Wk 18 | 45% | 55% | 65% |
| Wk 19 | 47% | 57% | 66% |
| Wk 20 | 47% | 57% | 67% |
| Wk 21 | 47% | 57% | 67% |
| Wk 22 | 47% | 57% | 67% |
| Wk 23 | 47% | 57% | 67% |
| Wk 24 | 47% | 57% | 67% |
Lipscomb
Austin Peay
|
1-1 (50%) |
Head to Head |
1-1 (50%) |
|
17-13 (56.7%) |
Overall |
20-9 (69%) |
|
11-1 (91.7%) |
Home |
10-1 (90.9%) |
|
6-11 (35.3%) |
Away |
9-7 (56.3%) |
|
0-2 (0%) |
Versus Top 25 |
0-0 (0%) |
|
4-8 (33.3%) |
Versus > .500 Teams |
3-7 (30%) |
|
13-5 (72.2%) |
Versus < .500 Teams |
17-2 (89.5%) |
|
5-5 (50%) |
Last 10 Games |
7-3 (70%) |
Lipscomb
Austin Peay
| #138 Austin Peay | Best Win | #150 Queens NC |
| #298 Stetson | Worst Loss | #275 Bellarmine |
| 34 pts vs #256 Alabama A&M | Largest MOV | 29 pts vs #338 North Alabama |
| 44 pts vs #18 Vanderbilt | Largest MOD | 14 pts vs #275 Bellarmine |
Lipscomb
Austin Peay
| 77.6 | Points per Game | 79 |
| 77 | Points Against | 74.6 |
| 80.8 | Home PPG | 82.9 |
| 68.6 | Home PA | 71.4 |
| 76.7 | Away PPG | 76.8 |
| 82.9 | Away PA | 76.8 |
| 438-486 | Opponent Record | 385-520 |
| 223.3 | Avg Opponent Rank | 234.7 |
| W 5 | Longest Streak | W 10 |
| L 1 | Current Streak | L 1 |
Lipscomb
Austin Peay
| Mar 6 | FGCU (14-18) | L53-77 | Mar 7 | Queens NC (20-14) | L83-90 |
| Feb 28 | at E Kentucky (9-21) | W80-77 | Mar 6 | Stetson (10-21) | W69-60 |
| Feb 25 | at West Georgia (13-17) | L77-84 | Feb 28 | at Bellarmine (11-19) | L97-111 |
| Feb 21 | vs North Alabama (7-21) | W73-51 | Feb 25 | vs Cent Arkansas (20-12) | L88-93 |
| Feb 18 | at Bellarmine (11-19) | W75-72 | Feb 21 | at Jacksonville (10-20) | W65-61 |
| Feb 14 | at Queens NC (20-14) | L81-87 | Feb 19 | at North Florida (5-25) | W77-76 |
| Feb 11 | vs E Kentucky (9-21) | W75-61 | Feb 14 | vs Bellarmine (11-19) | W90-70 |
| Feb 7 | vs Cent Arkansas (20-12) | L78-86 | Feb 11 | at Queens NC (20-14) | W95-87 |
| Feb 4 | at Austin Peay (20-9) | L76-87 | Feb 7 | vs North Alabama (7-21) | W91-62 |
| Jan 31 | at North Florida (5-25) | W100-94 | Feb 4 | vs Lipscomb (17-13) | W87-76 |
vs
College Basketball